DUE TO ESSENTIAL MAINTENANCE OUR PHONE LINES AND EMAIL
SERVERS WILL BE INTERMITTENT UNTIL NOON FRIDAY 25TH OCTOBER.
We apologise for any inconvenience.Close
In personal injury cases, the courts and insurance providers use a discount rate to determine the present value of the compensation that needs to be paid to an injured individual (claimant).
The discount rate works under the theory that the party providing the personal injury award can discount the sum provided to the claimant by a small amount because the claimant will be able to make up the difference between the actual award and the sum provided by investing the sum.
In practice, discount rates are set to reflect small and conservative investment gains that accrue over long and low-risk investments. For example, a claimant entitled to a £1,000 claim with a 2.5 discount rate would receive a £975 sum because he or she is expected to be able to earn 2.5 per cent interest a year on the sum.
The decision has proven controversial because it has changed the discount rate from 2.5 per cent (adopted in 2001) to -0.75 per cent. This change is drastic because it effectively requires any party paying a claim to increase—rather than discount—the sum that is provided to the claimant.
The Lord Chancellor justified this decision by citing previous case law establishing that the purpose of awards for personal injury victims is to put the injured party in the financial position that he or she would have been if there had been no injury. To this end, the Lord Chancellor concluded that an accurate discount rate must represent the true and current conditions of long-term investment markets. Noting that the last discount rate calculation dated back to 2001, the Lord Chancellor determined that a rate of -0.75 per cent represents an accurate discount rate for claimants in the current market.
Personal injury advocates welcomed this announcement stating that a new rate was long overdue and that it does a better job at providing financial compensation to individuals who now face long-term, if not permanent, restrictions on their ability to provide for themselves.
Insurers sharply criticised the decision by stating that it has arbitrarily increased the sums they must provide to personal injury victims and will result in millions of pounds of lost profits. Insurers are expected to file an appeal to reverse this decision.
The Association of British Insurers called the decision ‘crazy’, and estimated that it will directly increase motor and liability premiums for millions of UK drivers and businesses, including 36 million individual and commercial motor policies. PricewaterhouseCoopers warned that the average annual comprehensive motor premium will rise by up to £75 and young drivers could see increases up to £1,000. And industry experts have warned that the decision could land the already burdened NHS with an additional annual £1 billion bill.
Unless an appeal is successful, employers may see higher premiums soon. They may also be expected to implement extra or stricter policies to prevent motorist-related accidents.
Should you be concerned about your future insurance costs please contact us using the form below.